Marriage of Meek v. Meek

In my view, the whole of this opinion should be affirmed pursuant to the dictates of Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980) and Firestone v. Firestone, 263 So.2d 223 (Fla.1972). The trial court may have erred in failing to properly label the award of the one-quarter interest in the sailboat to the former wife. However, an erroneous label, where another theory would justify the award, merits an affirmance.1

In this case, the record supports the trial judge’s conclusion that both parties started and operated a taxi cab company, and the wife’s work efforts entitled her to a one-quarter…