Santoro v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
District Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
HARTSHORNE, District Judge.
In this suit under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, U.S.C.A. Title 45, § 51 et seq., brought by plaintiff, defendant railroad’s crossing watchman, for silicosis alleged to have been suffered as a result of his employment by defendant, there was a verdict for defendant. Thereupon plaintiff moved for a new trial on the grounds: (1) that the verdict was so far against the weight of the evidence as to indicate passion, prejudice or mistake on the part of the jury, and that (2) the trial court erred in refusing one of plaintiff’s requests to charge, at conference…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BehymerSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Beck v. Monmouth Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Burton v. Weyerhaeuser Timber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1941
- Hellweg v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Trantham v. Canal Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1953
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holladay v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1966
- Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. OsborneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997