Legal Opinion

State v. Regedanz

Mercer County Court of Common Pleas

Decided December 12, 1953No. 3400Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By DULL, J.

A certain request in writing from counsel for defendant was submitted in open court to the prosecuting attorney. The request was orally refused by the prosecuting attorney. The request reads as follows:

“Now come James C. Blair and Howard Everett, attorneys for the defendant and demand an inspection and copy or permission to make copies of the hospital report concerning a certain blood test purportedly taken of the defendant; and the right to interview the technician who was the party who prepared said purported report.”

The matter was submitted to the court upon the memoranda…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. State v. MajorSummit County Court of Common Pleas · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API