Legal Opinion · Dissent

Steinberg v. Forest Hills Golf Range, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1952Published

1DissentDye, J.

We all agree that since the subject property has been “ filled in and graded ” and is being used as a “ golf driving range ”, it comes within the meaning of the Emergency Rent Laws and that the defendants-respondents are entitled to continue in possession as a statutory tenant during the emergency (Commercial Rent Law, § 1; L. 1945, ch. 3, as amd.; McKinney’s Unconsol. Laws, § 8521 et seq.; Business Rent Law, § 1; L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.; McKinney’s Unconsol. Laws, § 8551 et seq.). We disagree as to what constitutes the reasonable rent to be charged.

When the Legislature authorized a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. In re ApplebyNew York Court of Appeals · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API