Laminack v. State

Beasley, Judge.

Martha Ann Laminack was convicted of operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. OCGA § 40-6-391.

1. The first enumeration is that the circumstantial evidence did not exclude every other reasonable hypothesis save that of guilt. OCGA § 24-4-6.

The evidence showed that on the night in question, appellant and Dominick left her home between 7:00 and 7:30 p.m. in his new car. They drove around the countryside for a couple of hours and then went to a river, where they stayed until about 10:00 to 10:30 p.m.

During the evening, Dominick purchased either 16 or 24 bottles of…