Legal Opinion

Moore v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 24, 1944No. 9545PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McAllister, circuit judge.

On August 1, 1933, appellee taxpayer had on hand .certain automobile tires, which had been manufactured from cotton and other materials. It paid on the cotton a tax provided for by § 16 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act.1 Another tax on cotton included in manufactured tires, known as the manufacturers’ excise tax, was provided for by the Revenue Act of 1932.2 In filing its excise tax return under the 1932 Act, the taxpayer made a deduction of the amount of cotton sought to be taxed thereunder, contending that such deduction in the excise tax return was authorized…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. WhitworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Davies' Estate v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. B. F. Goodrich Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API