Legal Opinion

Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Daw

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 17, 2000No. 1991060PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In its opinion in this case, the Court of Civil Appeals stated: "This case requires us to decide whether Rule 32(B)(6), Ala. R. Jud. Admin., allows a trial court to reduce an obligor's child-support payment to his two minor children by deducting from the obligor's gross monthly income the amount he has been ordered to pay on arrears in a child-support judgment for another child, when the other `child' had reached the age of majority five years earlier." State exrel. Daw v. Daw, 786 So.2d 1131, 1132 (Ala.Civ.App. 2000). The trial court reduced the obligor's child-support obligation payable to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ex Parte OswaltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  2. Burlington Northern R. Co. v. WhittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Ex Parte State Ex Rel. LamonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Waltman v. WaltmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  5. Foster v. FosterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. W.L.S. v. K.S.S.V.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ex Parte JettSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Ex Parte Ward, 1090132 (Ala. 6-3-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  4. McCartha v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2011
  5. State v. ClemonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API