Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Arrowood Indemnity Company v. Mississippi Windstorm Underwriting Association
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided June 16, 2016No. 2014-CA-01638-SCTPublished
1ConcurrenceDickinson, Presiding Justice
¶ 29. Because I maintain my view that the Windpool possesses no statutory authority to promulgate a statute of limitations for the true-up process,71 do not join the majority’s tolling analysis but agree *462the Windpool had no right to refuse to accept Arrowood’s refíled premium data.
COLEMAN, J, JOINS THIS OPINION.. Miss. Windstorm Underwriting Ass’n v. Union Nat’l Fire Ins. Co., 86 So.3d 216, 231-32 (Miss.2012) (Dickinson, P.J., dissenting).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Mississippi Windstorm Underwriting Ass'n v. Union National Fire InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 2012