Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Arrowood Indemnity Company v. Mississippi Windstorm Underwriting Association

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 2016No. 2014-CA-01638-SCTPublished

1ConcurrenceDickinson, Presiding Justice

¶ 29. Because I maintain my view that the Windpool possesses no statutory authority to promulgate a statute of limitations for the true-up process,71 do not join the majority’s tolling analysis but agree *462the Windpool had no right to refuse to accept Arrowood’s refíled premium data.

COLEMAN, J, JOINS THIS OPINION.. Miss. Windstorm Underwriting Ass’n v. Union Nat’l Fire Ins. Co., 86 So.3d 216, 231-32 (Miss.2012) (Dickinson, P.J., dissenting).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mississippi Windstorm Underwriting Ass'n v. Union National Fire InsuranceMississippi Supreme Court · 2012