Legal Opinion
Lenox Hill Hospital v. Government Employees Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 2011PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Given the limited nature of the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, which established the plaintiffs prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law solely on the ground that the defendant did not pay or deny the subject claim within 30 days (see 11 NYCRR 65-3.8 [c]), the defendant’s only burden in opposition to the motion was to raise a triable issue of fact regarding its timely payment or denial of the claim (see e.g. Westchester Med. Ctr. v Clarendon Natl. Ins. Co., 57 AD3d 659, 659-660 [2008]; see generally Stukas v Streiter, 83 AD3d 18, 24 [2011]). The defendant succeeded in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stukas v. StreiterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Djoganopoulos v. PolkesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Crummell v. Avis Rent A Car System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Westchester Medical Center v. Clarendon National InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by8 opinions
- Williams v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Westchester Medical Center v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- 6014 Eleventh Avenue Realty, LLC v. 6014 AH, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- 6014 Eleventh Avenue Realty, LLC v. 6014 AH, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- American Tr. Ins. Co. v. Beach Med. Rehabilitation, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.