Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Ianotti & Safari Motor Coaches, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—White, J.
In the fall of 1993 in Pennsylvania, petitioner purchased a motor home manufactured by respondent which he subsequently registered in New York. As the result of electrical problems, on May 9, 1994 petitioner brought the motor home for repair to Orange Motor Company in the City of Albany, where it remained until June 13, 1994 when it was removed at respondent’s direction, apparently without the electrical problem having been resolved. Petitioner then sought arbitration under the New Car Lemon Law (General Business Law § 198-a). Following a hearing, the arbitrator awarded petitioner a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MOTOR VEHICLE MFRS. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- In re the Arbitration between Hynson & American Motors Sales Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- General Motors Corp. v. LeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Forest River, Inc. v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- In re Arbitration between Jarvis & Safari Motor Coaches, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Arbitration between Megatouch Used Cars & Trucks, Inc. & New York State Dispute Resolution Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Arbitration between Megatouch Used Cars & Trucks, Inc. & New York State Dispute Resolution Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012