Legal Opinion

Echols v. Saul (CONSENT)

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided October 1, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00836Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION ANNE ECHOLS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No.: 3:19-cv-836-SMD ) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner, Social Security ) Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER I. INTRODUCTION Anne Echols (“Plaintiff”) filed a Title II application for a period of disability and disability insurance benefits and a Title XVI application for supplemental security income in May 2017 alleging disability beginning in February 2017. R. 15, 155–65. The application was denied at the initial administrative level, and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Renee S. Phillips v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Jack Bloodsworth v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  5. Bobby Dyer v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API