Legal Opinion

Shea v. New York State Office of Mental Health

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 8, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted plaintiffs and intervenor a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants from implementing any further service reductions at the Buffalo Psychiatric Center and from implementing defendant’s work force reduction plan. Plaintiffs and intervenor met the criteria for entitlement to such relief (see, CPLR 6301; Aetna Ins. Co. v Capasso, 75 NY2d 860). Mental Hygiene Law § 7.17 (e) does not prohibit injunctive relief when the notice…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. CapassoNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Wood v. GlassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Civil Service Employees Ass'n v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Quigley v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API