People v. Rodriquez
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for new trial and from the judgments pronounced on defendants after a verdict finding them guilty of robbery in the first degree.
Defendants urge as grounds for reversal of the order and judgments (1) that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdict and judgments, (2) an error of law in admitting evidence, (3) errors in refusing to give instructions to the jury requested by them.
Defendants were convicted on circumstantial evidence.
On the evening of November 21, 1938, Pete Gallato, the victim of the robbery, went to the home of Rodriquez…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. CostelloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- People v. CrittendenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- People v. CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. LyonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. DodsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946