Legal Opinion

United States v. Boston & M. R. R.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 4, 1941No. 3584PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MAGRUDER, Circuit Judge.

The United States brought this action to collect from the railroad the statutory penalty imposed by Section 3 of the Cruelty to Animals Act, 34 Stat. 607, 4¿j U.S.C.A. § 73. This Act forbids carriers to confine animals in cars for a continuous period in excess of 36 hours without unloading the same into properly equipped pens for rest, water and feeding, “unless prevented by storm or by other accidental or unavoidable causes which can not be anticipated or avoided by the exercise of due diligence and foresight”. Section 1,45 U.S.C.A. § 71. Section 3 imposes a penalty…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific R. Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. New York Cent. & H. R. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1908
  3. Newport News & M. Val. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1894
  4. Boston & M. R. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941
  5. Chicago, B. & Q. R. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. New York Cent. R. R.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API