Legal Opinion

Lounsberry v. Hoffpauir

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 1, 1967No. 2074PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Motion to Dismiss Appeal.

TATE, Judge.

The defendant appeals from a trial court judgment overruling two exceptions. The plaintiffs move to dismiss because the appeal is from an interlocutory judgment which normally is not appealable.

The defendant contends that the present interlocutory judgment may cause irreparable injury, and that therefore it may be appealed. LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2083.

The defendant appeals from the overruling of his exceptions (a) of no cause of action and (b) of unauthorized use of summary proceedings. The thrust of both of these exceptions is that the plaintiffs can no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rapides Cent. Ry. Co. v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Woodcock v. CrehanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lounsberry v. HoffpauirLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Sylvester v. St. Landry Parish Police JuryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
  3. Peterson v. Monnerjahn Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Cotton's Holsum Employees Federal Credit Union v. SilersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
  5. Voisin v. LukeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API