Legal Opinion

State v. Montgomery

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 27, 2021No. 122237PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 122,237 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellant, v. DAVID CLAYTON MONTGOMERY, Appellee. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. For purposes of a potential downward departure sentence, when a court is evaluating whether a nonstatutory factor can be a mitigating factor as a matter of law, the court must consider whether the Legislature, through the sentencing grid, has already taken the factor into account. If it has, then the factor cannot be a mitigating factor as a matter of law. 2. The Legislature, through the sentencing guidelines, has accounted for the difference in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MurdockSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. FavelaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. State v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995
  4. State v. BirdSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  5. State v. BlackmonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. OathoutCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API