Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Milam

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided April 15, 1950No. Civ. 441PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. MILLER, Judge.

This catise was originally filed in the State Court and removed to this court on the ground of diversity of citizenship and jurisdictional amount. There is now before the court a motion to remand alleging that the court is without jurisdiction because one of the plaintiffs, Mariam Taylor Gaylord, and some of the defendants were citizens of the same state, California, at the time the suit was commenced. Defendants, in the removal petition, alleged that this plaintiff was a citizen of Arkansas, in which event complete diversity would be present, and thus, the citizenship…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Williams v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Williamson v. OsentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Garberson v. GarbersonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1949

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Orville E. Stifel, II v. William F. Hopkins, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
  2. Codagnone v. PerrinDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1972
  3. Linscott v. LinscottDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1951
  4. Ellis v. Southeast Construction CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1958
  5. Orville E. Stifel, II v. William F. Hopkins, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API