Legal Opinion

Booe v. Davis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1839PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Trespass for breaking and entering the plaintiff’s close. Pleas, not guilty and liberum tenementum. The issues were submitted to a jury for trial. After the plaintiff had closed his testimony, the defendants moved the Court to nonsuit the plaintiff. The plaintiff objected, but the Court directed the nonsuit to be entered. The bill of exceptions states, “that the defendants having introduced no testimony, moved the Court to nonsuit the plaintiff, to which the plaintiff objected, but the Court overruled his objection and nonsuited' him; to which opinion, &c. the .plaintiff excepts.”

The only…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Crane v. Lessee of MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. Doe on the Demise of Elmore v. GrymesSupreme Court of the United States · 1828

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hurd v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Terminix Co. v. Fulton Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Tison v. YawnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1854
  4. Wiley v. ShoemakSupreme Court of Iowa · 1849

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API