Bank of Kaplan v. Richards
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Concurrence
O’NIELL, O. J.
(concurring). There is a good reason why a receiver appointed to liquidate the affairs of a corporation has no right to sell or assign to third parties the corporation’s claims against its stock subscribers for the unpaid part of their subscriptions, instead of suing the subscribers for the amounts. The right of a receiver to sue a subscriber for an unpaid subscription is dependent upon the necessity for collecting the subscription; that is to say, upon the necessity for paying debts of the corporation or for equalizing the losses sustained by the stock subscribers who have paid…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jackson Fire & Marine Insurance v. WalleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
- Belknap v. AdamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1897