Legal Opinion

Steele v. Parikh

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 9, 1999No. 98-2804PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Olga M. Steele appeals an order enforcing a settlement agreement on the motion of Nitin J. Parikh, M.D. and Mid-Florida Gastroenterology Group (“Parikh”). Steele argues on appeal that the trial court abused its discretion because Parikh did not prove there was a meeting of the minds between the parties. We affirm.

Steele was the personal representative of the estate of her husband, Clifford Steele, and she sued Parikh for medical malpractice. At the hearing on the motion to enforce the settlement agreement, Steele’s attorney stipulated to the facts alleged by Parikh. Steele’s attorney conveyed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Robbie v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Long Term Managmt. v. Univ. Nursing CareDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  3. Hartley v. HartleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. Maher v. Best Western InnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. InterAmerican Car Rental, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API