Legal Opinion

In re the Dependency of E.H.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 21, 2010No. Nos. 39641-6-II; 39731-5-IIPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPenoyar, C.J.

¶1 BD and TH are the indigent parents of EH,1 a seven-year-old boy. The juvenile court found EH dependent as to both parents over four years ago. At the recommendation of the Department of Social and Health Services (Department), the juvenile court commissioner ordered a permanency plan of nonparental custody for EH and granted concurrent jurisdiction to the family court to hear the nonparental custody action that KH, EH’s half-sister and temporary custodian, had filed. The juvenile court judge revised the concurrent jurisdiction order, specifying that the family court would also decide the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blanchard v. Golden Age Brewing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1936
  2. In RE DILLENBURG v. MaxwellWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. WernerWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Scott v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Custody of R.S.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API