Legal Opinion

United States v. Watkins

U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review

Decided March 17, 1976No. CGCMS 23131; Docket No. 786PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BRIDGMAN, Judge:

The accused was charged with four offenses: a 21 day unauthorized absence (Art. 86, 10 U.S.C. § 886); missing movement through design (Art. 87); breaking restriction (Art. 134); and disobedience of an order (Art. 90). He elected to be tried by military judge alone, entered pleas of guilty to all offenses, and both individually and through counsel, requested a BCD. Prior to announcing sentence the military judge ruled that the first three offenses were multiplicious for punishment purposes. The military judge also stated:

I am going to award confinement in an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. RiveraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  3. United States v. ArnoldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. MartinezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. HubbardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. DotsonU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1980
  2. United States v. FriedmanU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. DotsonU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. GreenU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API