Legal Opinion

State v. Carroll

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 28, 1973No. 7315SC170PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Defendant has argued that it was error for the trial court to allow the witness to testify that defendant was an “inmate” of the North Carolina Department of Correction on 8 December 1970, and that he was “captured.” The fact that a person is a prison inmate is a status based on observable facts, as is the fact of his apprehension in some place other than the designated place of confinement. The witness having personally observed these facts may testify to them. Likewise, the judgment and order of commitment upon conviction of a felony on 5 December 1969 in Alamance County…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Burns v. SwensonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Carolina v. MaddoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API