Legal Opinion

State v. Ochoa-Lara

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 25, 2015No. 112322PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goering, J.:

Guadalupe Ochoa-Lara was convicted of two counts of identity theft following a bench trial on stipulated facts. Ochoa-Lara argues on appeal that the charges should have been dismissed by the district court because the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) preempts state prosecution for identity theft based on the unlawful use of another person s Social Security number. Ochoa-Lara also argues that the charges were multiplici-tous. We find that the IRCA does not preempt state prosecution for identity theft. We further find that Ochoa-Lara failed to raise the issue of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Arizona v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Altria Group, Inc. v. GoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  5. Chamber of Commerce of United States of America v. WhitingSupreme Court of the United States · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. Ochoa-LaraSupreme Court of Kansas · 2020
  2. Amended August 15, 2017 State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely MartinezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  3. Amended June 16, 2017 State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely MartinezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  4. State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely MartinezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017
  5. State of Iowa v. Martha Aracely MartinezSupreme Court of Iowa · 2017

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API