Legal Opinion
People v. Rioz
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 15, 1984No. F002422PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[Opinion certified for partial publication. 1 ]
Counsel Howard J. Berman, Robert J. Wade, Cliff Gardner and Frank DiSabatino, under appointments by the Court of Appeal, for Defendants and Appellants. John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Eddie T. Keller, Janice Rogers Brown and Raymond L. Brosterhous II, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Opinion
HAMLIN, J.
—Defendants Jorge Ramirez, Geraldo Flores and Federico Marroquin were charged by information with forcible rape in concert (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2), 2 and § 264.1) and false imprisonment (§ 236). 3 Additionally,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- People v. VaronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- People v. CarreonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- People v. ChavezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. TidwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- People v. CasasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- People v. FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- Kerry Ellison v. Nicholas F. Brady, Secretary of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- People v. SteeleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.