Legal Opinion

Martinonis v. Town of Kingston

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 16, 1983No. 83-051PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue in this tax abatement case is whether the plaintiffs sustained their burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the assessments of their real property, for the years 1975 and 1978 through 1981, were disproportionate. We hold that the plaintiffs sustained their burden and therefore affirm.

The plaintiffs acquired two separate commercial properties in Kingston in 1969. In each year in question, the Town of Kingston (town) placed an assessed value on the properties for tax purposes and then applied the applicable tax rates. The plaintiffs disputed the assessments…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Berthiaume v. City of NashuaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. Town of Croydon v. Current Use Advisory BoardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Brickman v. City of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  4. Appeal of AndersonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Locke Lake Colony Ass'n v. Town of BarnsteadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
  2. Appeal of Town of PlymouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  3. City of Manchester v. Town of AuburnSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API