Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n, Inc. v. New Prime, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WHIPPLE, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Plaintiffs filed Suggestions in Opposition and Defendants replied thereto. Defendant argues that the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Alexander v. Sandoval requires the Court to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims because there is no private right of action to enforce the regulations that Plaintiffs seek to enforce. See Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275, 121 S.Ct. 1511, 149 L.Ed.2d 517 (2001). For the reasons stated herein, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion.
Background
Plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Springdale Education Ass'n v. Springdale School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Sandoval v. HaganCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Craft v. Graebel-Oklahoma Movers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. YRC, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
- Starr Indemnity & Liability Company v. YRC, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018