Legal Opinion
Phar-Mor of Florida, Inc. v. Steuernagel
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided October 25, 1989No. Nos. 88-03457, 88-03483PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.
This is a consolidated appeal in which appellants/defendants, Phar-Mor of Florida, Inc. (Phar-Mor) and Searstown Partners, Ltd. (Searstown), challenge the trial court order that granted appellees/plain-tiffs, Linda Steuernagel and Donald Steuer-nagel (the Steuernagels), a new trial after the jury returned a verdict for appellants. Both appellants argue that the order granting the Steuernagels a new trial was an abuse of discretion by the trial judge. We agree with appellants and reverse on the basis of that issue. We do not reach the separate issue' raised by Searstown…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Baptist Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. BellSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Smith v. BrownSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- Fitzgerald v. Molle-TeetersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- McNair v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc. v. VroomDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- FRED MEYERS AND NINIBETH MEYERS v. BONNEVA SHONTZDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Jones v. StevensonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Hernandez v. FelicianoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- WILLIE LAFAYETTE and SOUTHEASTERN FREIGHT LINES, INC. v. RITA GENOVESE, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of MICHAEL GENOVESEDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021