Legal Opinion

Ingle v. Asheville Power & Light Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Harding, J., at May Term, 1916, of BuNcoatbe.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, O. J.

This action is brought by the plaintiff as adminis-tratrix of her husband, who was killed by defendant’s street ear on Montford Avenue in Asheville, 13 September, 1915. Four issues were submitted, i. e., neg-ligence, contributory negligence, last clear chance, and damages. The first, three issues were answered “Yes” and the damages for the death of the intestate were assessed at $4,750.

The intestate was a farmer and went to Asheville on the day of his death with a load of peaches, potatoes, and apples for sale, accompanied by one of his five children, a little boy. At a house on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pickett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Ledbetter v. . EnglishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  3. Henderson v. Durham Traction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Norman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Norman v. Charlotte Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pickett v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Lea v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  3. Hanes v. . Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  4. Norman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Hanes v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API