Harco Holdings, Incorporated, and Subsidiaries v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.
Life insurance companies receive favorable treatment under the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify for such favorable treatment, an insurance company must meet statutory criteria that measure how much of the company’s business is life insurance. In 1978, the tax year in question, the qualification test was codified at 26 U.S.C. § 801 (1978 Supp.). 1 We are called upon to interpret a small portion of the statute and to decide whether accrued unpaid losses should be taken into account when determining whether an insurance company is a life insurance company.
I
Harco Holdings,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- New York v. MacLaySupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- United States v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Helvering v. Inter-Mountain Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- McCoach v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Vms Securities Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Best Life Assurance Company of California v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Wisconsin Power and Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Central Reserve Life Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1999
- Gulf Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.