Legal Opinion

Campbell v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 28, 1989No. 425-86CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

YOCK, Judge.

This contract case is currently before the Court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Since it is concluded that this Court lacks jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ claims herein, the defendant’s motion is granted and the plaintiffs’ complaint is to be dismissed. Having decided that this Court does not have jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ claims herein, the defendant’s counterclaim must also be dismissed.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In the early 1970’s, the plaintiffs, Elmer and Marie Campbell, were engaged in the operation of a family dairy farm located near Yale in St.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  5. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Xp Vehicles, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  2. Floyd v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Harriman v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API