Legal Opinion

Jones Bros. v. Hiers

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 16, 1900PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Before Townsend, J., Colleton, September, 1897. Action by Jones Brothers against C. M. Hiers. Defendant appeals. As to charge on the facts: 50 S. C., 168; 47 S. C., 488; 49 S. C., 4971 51 S. C., 461. As to prerequisites of recording mortgage so as to make it notice: 22 S. C., 332. As to kind of damages recoverable in actions of this kind: 39 S. C., 465.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Jones.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action of claim and delivery of a black mare. Plaintiffs claimed under a past due chattel mortgage, executed to them by J. W. Carter, and in their complaint also alleged the following agreement in writing by the defendant: “Lodge, S. C., October 14, 1898. I hereby certify that I have a black mare which I bought from James Carter, which Jones Bros, hold a mortgage over, and that I will be responsible for said mare until mortgage is satisfied. C. M. Hiers.” 'The defendant…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCarley v. Glenn-Lowry Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1906
  2. Watson v. SprottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  3. Jackson v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API