Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Malley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 1920PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by the defendants, James A. O’Reilly and another, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 22d day of March, 1920, as denies a motion made by said defendants to vacate a writ of attachment.

1Opinion of the Court

Page, J.:

The plaintiff claims to have been employed by the defendants as an agent to solicit business for a concern known as the Sun Navigation Company, owned and controlled by the defendants, on the agreement to pay for such services the sum of $50 each week plus ten per cent of the gross amount of business which the plaintiff during such employment should secure for the defendants. The plaintiff was paid his $50 a week during the period of his employment, and claims that he secured business to the amount of $60,000, and that there is $6,000 due him for his services from July 1 to December…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Laco X-Ray Systems, Inc. v. FingerhutAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Societe Generale Alsacienne De Banque, Zurich v. Flemingdon Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Eaton Factors Co. v. Double Eagle Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1962
  4. Rosenthal v. Rochester Button Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Sylmark Holdings Ltd. v. Silicone Zone International Ltd.New York Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API