Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lumpkin v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 2014No. 1130999, 1131000, and 1131001Published

1DissentMoore, Chief Justice

The issue raised by these three appeals is whether filing a cost bond within the 30-day statutory period for taking an appeal to the circuit court from a property-assessment decision by a county board of equalization is a jurisdictional requirement for perfecting the appeal. Because I believe that filing a bond for costs is merely a procedural requirement, namely a correctable deficiency, I respectfully dissent from this Court’s opinion affirming the judgments of the trial court.

*610 Facts and Procedural History

Edwin B. Lumpkin, Jr., owns three self-storage facilities in Birmingham, which…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Denson v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  2. Finch v. FinchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Bryan v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Ex Parte DotySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  5. State Dept. of Human Resources v. FunkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API