Lumpkin v. State
Supreme Court of Alabama
1DissentMoore, Chief Justice
The issue raised by these three appeals is whether filing a cost bond within the 30-day statutory period for taking an appeal to the circuit court from a property-assessment decision by a county board of equalization is a jurisdictional requirement for perfecting the appeal. Because I believe that filing a bond for costs is merely a procedural requirement, namely a correctable deficiency, I respectfully dissent from this Court’s opinion affirming the judgments of the trial court.
*610 Facts and Procedural History
Edwin B. Lumpkin, Jr., owns three self-storage facilities in Birmingham, which…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Denson v. First National Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Finch v. FinchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Bryan v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Ex Parte DotySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- State Dept. of Human Resources v. FunkCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.