Legal Opinion

Hutsell v. Current

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 27, 1950Published

1Opinion of the Court

Stanley, Commissioner

Reversing.

The principal question is whether a party suing on a new promise to pay an obligation .must prove not only that promise but also an original promise. A secondary question is whether intrinsic circumstances and a claimed discrepancy in testimony was sufficient to authorize the submission of the case to the jury as against positive proof of an acknowledgment and a promise to pay.

Mrs. Nancy Ralls Hútsell sued the administrator of the estate of T. W. Current to recover $13,044.39 upon his acknowledgement and promise to pay a debt, the collection of which had become…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vinson's Ex'xs v. Maynard, Etc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  2. Hutsell v. Current's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  3. Meyer v. Zotel's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API