Legal Opinion

Kelvin Ortiz-Bouchet v. U.S. Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 23, 2013No. 12-10901PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Kelvin Ortiz-Bouchet (“Ortiz”) and his wife, Edith Malpica-Zapata (“Mal-pica”), petition for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order of removal, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(A), 1 on the grounds that they were inadmissible at the time of their adjustment of status. First, the IJ found that Ortiz and Malpica were inadmissible under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) because they were not in possession of valid entry documents at the time of their adjustment of status. Second, the IJ found that Ortiz was inadmissible under 8…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jean Neckson Cadet v. John M. BulgerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Calle v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. Lanier v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  4. KAI HING HUIBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1975
  5. ARRABALLY AND YERRABELLYBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Catherine Torres v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. Ronaldo Marques v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  3. Xing Yang v. Eric Holder, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. A.J. VALDEZ and Z. VALDEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2018
  5. Baljinder Singh v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API