Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided April 22, 1977PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANCE, Judge.

This is a suit against the City of Louisville and some of its police officers for an alleged assault and battery upon appellants which resulted in a jury verdict for appel-lees. The question is whether it was preju-dicially erroneous to require the jury to deliberate upon the case without complying with its request that the court reporter’s transcript of the testimony of two witnesses be read to them.

The case was submitted to the jury at the end of the second day. On the morning of the third day the jury returned to the court room and asked to have the testimony of two witnesses…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Little v. WhitehouseCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Smith v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Young v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Bellamy v. PathakCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API