Legal Opinion

Smith v. Eames

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1841PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Tñls cause was tried in the Court below, at the March term, 1840, before the Hon. William Thomas and a jury. Verdict and judgment were rendered for the plaintiff, for 1119.84 damages. A motion for a new trial was made and overruled. The defendant appealed to this Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBreese, Justice

This was an action of assumpsit, brought in the Morgan Circuit Court, by Eames against Smith, in which a judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, from which an appeal was taken to this Court. The only points presented for consideration are, first, as tó the competency of a juror who was called and sworn after being objected to; and, secondly, whether affidavits of jurors can be received to explain their verdict.

As to the first point, the bill of exceptions taken in the cause, states, that upon calling a jury, after the defendant had exhausted his peremptory challenges, Joseph J. Taggart was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. MatherNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  2. Dana v. TuckerNew York Supreme Court · 1809
  3. Durell v. MosherNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  4. Bleecker v. Satsop RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. PrestonIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Chalmers v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Loucks v. PierceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950
  4. People v. MolMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  5. People v. PrestonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API