Legal Opinion
Mauro v. Mauro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 6, 2004PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a matrimonial action in which the parties were divorced by judgment dated December 2, 1991, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Spolzino, J.), entered December 18, 2003, which denied his motion to vacate the judgment of divorce entered upon his failure to appear or answer.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant admits that he had notice of the judgment of divorce three years before he made the motion to vacate. Accordingly, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to vacate the judgment of divorce and to reopen the issue…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- 96 Pierrepont, LLC v. MauroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Nahmani v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Olesniewicz v. KhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Cook v. CookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Hartcorn v. HartcornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by7 opinions
- 425 East 26th Street Owners Corp. v. BeatonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- DeStaso v. BottiglieriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Sime v. LudharAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Calle v. CalleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Wunsch v. CerwinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.