Cashman v. Amador & Sacramento Canal Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. The case is stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite
This is an appeal under § 5. of the act of March 3, 1875, 18 Stat. 470, ch. 137, from an order of the-Circuit Court dismissing a suit, on the ground that it did not really and substantially involve a dispute or controversy properly within the jurisdiction of that court. The facts are these:
Cashman, the plaintiff, was an alien, and he owned a tract of seven hundred acres of land in Sacramento County, California, situated on the Cosumnes River, which it' is claimed was injured by the mining debris thrown on it in the working of certain mines by hydraulic process. On the 9th of September, 1885,…
2Cited by19 opinions
- Dudley Warren Schilling, Cross v. J. A. Belcher, Sr., Cross Dudley Warren Schilling v. J. A. Belcher, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Wheeler v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ferrara v. Philadelphia Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1967
- Hutchinson Box Board & Paper Co. v. HornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Matthies v. Seymour Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1958
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.