Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hargis

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 18, 1907PublishedCited by 25 opinions

CASE 45 — JAMES HARGIS WAS TRIED FOR MURDER. . RESULTING IN A HUNG JURY, AND THE COMMONWEALTH APPEALS. QUESTIONS OF LAW DECIDED Appeal from Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

John D. Carroll, Commissioner.

The appellee, James Hargis, was put upon liis separate trial under an indictment charging that: “ Jam.es Hargis, Elbert Hargis, Ed Callahan, Alexander Hargis, and Jesse Spicer committed the crime of murder, as follows, viz.: That said James Hargis, Elbert Hargis, Ed Callahan, Alexander Hargis, and Jesse Spicer, in connection with Curtis Jett -and William Britton, on the 24th day of January, 1905, in the County of Breathitt and State of Kentucky, did unlawfully, willfully, feloniously, and with malice aforethought, shoot and wound James…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Powers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  2. Howard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901
  3. Commonwealth v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1889
  4. Peoples v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  5. Mulligan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Allen v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Reed v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  3. Hawkins v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Ratliff v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  5. Gambrell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API