Legal Opinion

Wattles v. City of Lapeer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1879PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Lapeer. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

The city of' Lapeer brought suit against Wattles to recover the amount of the taxes appearing on the city tax-roll for 1877 assessed against him. Wattles defended on grounds going to the validity of the whole roll. The circuit judge held that he was precluded by the statute from contesting the validity of the tax, and gave judgment against him.

*626The statute which is supposed to have this effect is section 1016 of the Compiled Laws, which is as follows:

(1016.) Sec. 50. The production of any tax-roll on the trial of any action brought for the recovery of a tax therein assessed may, upon proof…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hart v. HendersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Hazel Park v. Municipal Finance CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
  2. State Tax-Law CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Silsbee v. StockleMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Hammond v. PlaceMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Moss v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API