Legal Opinion

United States v. Fernandez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 7, 2000No. 99-50738PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROTT, Circuit Judge:

The question before us is whether the district court properly sanctioned the United States for violating a discovery order by precluding the government from seeking the death penalty against Fernando Alvidrez, Marcel Arevalo, Daniel Bravo, Javier Alvidrez Duarte, Gerardo Jacobo, and Robert Mercado (collectively “Defendants”). The district court’s decision to impose this sanction was based on the government’s refusal to turn over its confidential predecisional death penalty evaluation form and prosecution memorandum, which contained information concerning the Attorney…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. United States v. CooksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. United Kingdom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. StinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Pacific Fisheries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. Esco WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API