Legal Opinion · Dissent

Yevoli v. Cristenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 30, 1971Published

1Dissent

Latham and Shapibo, JJ. (dissenting).

We believe that the county committee rules here under consideration are valid and we therefore dissent.

We agree that subdivision 2 of section 15 of the Election Law requires a party’s committee rules to be “ consistent ” with the Election Law, but, differing from the majority view, we are of the opinion that the rules are completely consistent with and do not violate any express provisions of that law or “ the general policy ” of subdivision 4 of section 137 and section 248 of the Election Law.

*158The majority, in a sweeping generalization, determines that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. Ingersoll v. CurranNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Matter of Ingersoll v. CurranNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  4. Ingersoll v. HeffernanNew York Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API