Legal Opinion

Weiffenbach v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1917No. 13960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, George H.'Walker, Judge pro tempore, entered July 11, 1916, in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

The respondent was invited to bid on the installation of certain ventilators and flashings for the L. C. Smith Building, Seattle, Washington. He was given two sets of specifications; one for masonry, and one for carpentry work. The specifications were prepared by architects having offices in Syracuse, in the state of New York. The set of specifications for masonry provided that the flashings and *392ventilators should be of galvanized iron of the Burt type. The set of specifications for carpentry provided that the flashings and ventilators should be of copper, and of a kind manufactured by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Snead & Co. Iron Works v. Merchants Loan & Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Morgan v. MurdoughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  3. Dexter v. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Shepherd & Sons v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tribble v. Yakima Valley Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API