Legal Opinion · Dissent

Luther v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1909No. 15,188Published

Rehearing of case reported in 80 Neb. 432.

1DissentLetton, J.

I cannot agree to the main holding in the opinion. It seems to hold that the selling of all malt liquids or *463liquors, regardless of whether they contain intoxicating properties, is prohibited. I think that a holding that the sale of malt beverages nonintoxicating in character is a crime, unless a license has first been obtained under the provisions of the liquor law, is an entirely new doctrine in this state, and gives to the law such a new and radically changed interpretation from that which has been followed by administrative, executive and judicial officers of the government for nearly 40…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Luther v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State v. StorySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API