Legal Opinion

Lincoln National Bank v. John Peirce Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to foreclose lien created by the Lien Law.

1Opinion of the Court

Hotchkiss, J.(1) For the reasons stated on the trial the amount owing by the New York Central Railroad Company must be fixed at the sum of $81,712.73, to which interest will be added. (2) If the decision of this case required me to pass upon the claim of the plaintiff that the acceptance of the assignment by the railroad company and its promise to pay to plaintiff all moneys earned under the contract, on the faith of which engagement plaintiff made its loans to the Peirce Company, was the legal equivalent of an actual payment by the railroad company to plaintiff, or constituted a novation,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Herrmann & Grace v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Toop v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Herrmann Grace v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. Ringle v. . Wallis Iron WorksNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Harvey v. . BrewerNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John Roshirt, Inc. v. RosenstockNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  2. J.C. Construction Management Corp. v. Robert Hunt Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API