Stockhaus v. Lind
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover $15,000 for alienation of wife’s affection. The answer was a general denial. From orders, Maguey, J., denying his motions to set aside the attachment and for a rehearing of motion, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The defendant appeals from an order denying his motion to dissolve a writ of attachment.
1. The statute is as follows: “In an action for the recovery of money, other than for libel, slander, seduction, breach of promise of marriage, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, or assault and 'battery, the plaintiff, at the time of issuing the summons or at any time thereafter, may have the property of the defendant attached in the manner hereinafter, prescribed as security for the satisfaction of such judgment' •as he may recover.” 2
The action was brought by the plaintiff for the alienation of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Schoeneman v. SowleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Viers v. PerrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910