Beyman v. Black
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Nueces. Tried below before the Hon. T. C. Barden. The facts are carefully stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Gould, Associate Justice.
On the 23d of June, 1874, Thomas Beyman,- inspector of hides and animals for the county of Nueces, with the unorganized county of Duval attached, and claiming to proceed under “ An act to encoinage stock-raising and for the protection of stock-raisers,” approved March 23, 1874, filed in the District Court of Nueces county, a paper, in the nature of a petition, entitled “ Ex parte Thomas Beyman, inspector of hides and animals, v. Sixty hides and ninety-five heads of cattle, seized for violation of statute.” He states that he had seized said hides and cattle at a…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Orr v. RhineTexas Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by18 opinions
- Clark, Sheriff v. Finley, ComptrollerTexas Supreme Court · 1899
- Phil. H. Pierce Co. v. WatkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- McGuire v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
- San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. State Ex Rel. DechmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Mabee v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.