Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Northern Pacific Railroad

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1897No. 2518PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Ohehalis County. — Hon. Mason Irwin, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered hy

Dunbar, J.

This is an action brought by the appellants against the Northern Pacific Eailroad Company and Andrew F. Burleigh, receiver thereof, alleging in their complaint that they had settled upon, improved and cultivated the lands in question in compliance with the provisions of the homestead laws of the United States, and that they offered to make preliminary homestead entries of said lands respectively before the register and receiver of the land office at Olympia, "W ashington, the same be-*535in g the land office of the district in which the lands…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  4. McNulta v. LochridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Central Trust Co. v. East Tennessee, V. & G. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Railroad Commission v. Alabama Great Southern R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Morse v. TackaberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Morse v. TackaberryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API